博众家之精华 2008-04-28 19:50:43 阅读688 评论2 字号:大中小
审 计
Chap. 1
“四大”会计师事务所:普华永道 Princewater - houseCoopers
安永 Ernst & Young
毕马威 KPMG
德勤 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
安达信 Arthur Anderson
安然 Enron
世通 worldcom
国际机构的名称:
国际会计师联合会 IFAC
国际会计师联合会下设的国际审计和鉴证准则理事会 IAASB
美国注册会计师协会 AICPA
中国注册会计师协会 CICPA
审计 audit
内部审计 internal audit
政府审计 public sector audit
账项基础审计 accounting number-based audit
风险导向审计方法 risk-oriented audit approach
Chap. 2
其他鉴证业务 audit related services
审阅业务 review
有限责任公司制 limited liability companies, LLCs
有限责任合伙制 limited liability partnerships, LLPs
Chap. 3
注册会计师职业道德规范 code of ethics for professional accountants
Rules of professional conduct
独立 independence
客观 objectivity
公正 integrity
专业胜任能力 professional competence
应有关注 due care
保密 confidentiality confidence
职业行为 professional conduct
技术准则 technical standards
保持实质上的独立和形式上的独立
The member is, and is seen to be independent
费用 fee
佣金 commission
经济利益 interest
经济利益的冲突 conflicts of interest
舞弊 fraud: refers to intentional acts which may involve the falsification of
documents and records, the misappropriation of assets, or misapplication of
accounting policies.
差错 error: refers to the unintentional misapplication of accounting policies,
oversights or misinterpretations of fact and clerical errors.
更换会计师事务所 Changes in professional appointments
Chap.4
国际趋同 global convergence /international convergence
鉴证业务 assurance services
全面质量管理 quality control of audit
Enforce the ethical guidance
Chap. 5
注册会计师的法律责任
Professional responsibility
“深口袋”理论 deep-pocket theory
创新会计处理 creative accounting
诉讼爆炸 litigation explosion
违约 breach the contract
过失 negligence
Misconduct
欺诈 cheat / illegal acts
Chap. 6
审计目标 audit objectives
怀疑态度 suspend
财务报表认定: financial statement assertions
存在 existence
权利与义务 rights and obligations
发生 occurrence
完整性 completeness
准确性和计价 measurement and valuation
分类和可理解性 classification and understandability
presentation and disclosure
财务报表循环 cycles
Sales and receivables cycle
Purchases and payables cycle
Wages and salaries cycle
Petty cash cycle
Inventory recording cycle
截止 cut-off
审计任务约定书 the letter of engagement
管理层声明书 report of the directors’ responsibilities for the financial statement
Chap. 7
审计证据 audit evidence
审计工作底稿 audit working paper
审计记录 audit records
Chap. 8
计划工作 planning
重要性 material: information is material if its omission or misstatement
could influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial
statements.
审计风险 audit risk
检查风险 detection risk
重大错报风险 risk of material misstatement in audit report
Chap. 9
风险评估 risk evaluation
分析复核程序 analytical review procedures
内部控制 internal control
局限性 limitation
控制环境 control environment
信息系统与沟通 information system and communication
符合性测试 compliance test
Chap. 10
控制测试 control test
报表层次重大错报 material misstatement on level of financial statement
认定层次重大错报 material misstatement on level of assertion
实质性程序 substantial procedures
Chap. 11
舞弊 fraud
Chap. 12
审计抽样 sampling
抽样风险 sampling risk
非抽样风险 non-sampling risk
统计抽样 statistical sampling
非统计抽样 non-statistical sampling
Chap. 13 Sales and receivables cycle
Chap.14 Purchases and payables cycle
Chap.15 Inventory recording cycle
监盘 physical inspection
Chap.16 Investment and finance cycle
Chap.17 Audit of monetary assets
Chap.18 完成审计工作 finish the audit work
期初余额 opening balance
期后事项events after the balance sheet date
Balance sheet
date
Up to the date of
the audit report
After the date of the
audit report but before
the financial statements
are issued
After the financial
statements are
issued
或有事项contingent evens
试算平衡表trail balance
Chap.19
审计报告
Audit report
审计报告的要素
标题 title
收件人 receiver
引言段 introduction
管理层对财务报表的责任段 management’s responsibility for the financial
statements
注册会计师的责任段 auditor’s responsibility
审计意见段 opinion
注册会计师的监管和盖章auditor’s signature
会计师事务所的名称、地址和盖章auditor’s address
报告日期 date of the Auditor’s report
无保留意见 unqualified audit report
非无保留意见 modified audit report
保留意见 qualified opinion
无法表示意见 disclaimer
否定意见 adverse
DEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
[Appropriate Addressee]
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of ABC Company, which comprise the
balance sheet as at December 31, 20X1, and the income statement, statement of changes in
equity and cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory notes.
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial
statements in accordance with Chinese Accounting Standard. This responsibility includes:
designing, implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting
estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with PRC auditing Standards. Those standards require
that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the
financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of (or “present fairly, in all
material respects,”) the financial position of ABC Company as of December 31, 20X1, and of its
financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Chinese
Accounting Standards.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
[Form and content of this section of the auditor’s report will vary depending on the nature of the
auditor’s other reporting responsibilities.]
[Auditor’s signature]
[Date of the auditor’s report]
[Auditor’s address]
Speech by Mr. Ian Ball, IFAC Chief Executive on the Release Ceremony forChinese Accounting Standards System for Business Enterprises and
Chinese Auditing Standards System
Beijing, China – February 15, 2006
Thank you very much, Dr Chen, for that kind introduction.
As the IFAC President, Graham Ward, said earlier, we are both pleased andgreatly honored to be here today as the Ministry of Finance of the People’sRepublic of China and the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountantsannounce their intention to converge Chinese auditing standards withInternational Standards on Auditing.
Your enormous achievements to date in strengthening the Chinese accountancyprofession through convergence towards international standards should not beviewed as an isolated event. It is significant and fundamental to the furtherdevelopment of your country’s capital marketsand is, I believe, fully consistent
with the reforms the People’s Republic of China has advanced in the last decade.
The reforms, including opening your door to increased trade, authorizing theprivate ownership of business entities, and encouraging foreign direct investment
by the establishment of free enterprise zones in coastal regions, have enhancedyour country’s role and reputation in the global markets. Adhering to high-quality
auditing standards is another way to strengthen your financial architecture and
confidence in your capital markets.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Chairman John Kellas willaddress you in a few moments on the work of the IAASB and on InternationalStandards on Auditing. The focus of my comments today is on IFAC, on our
initiatives to strengthen our standard-setting processes, and on the significance of
your most recent actions.
Let me first turn to IFAC, for those of you who may have limited knowledge aboutour organization. IFAC is comprised of 160 memberorganizations in 120
countries, most of which are national professional accountancy institutes, such asthe CICPA. These member bodies represent more than 2.5 million accountantsworldwide in business, industry, public practice, government, and academia.
IFAC’s mission is, in brief, to protect the public interest in order to contribute toeconomic growth and social stability worldwide. The primary means by which weaccomplish this is through our international standard-setting activities.
In addition to setting International Standards on Auditing, IFAC, through itsindependent standard-setting boards, also establishes ethical, education andpublic sector accounting standards. Our ethical and education standards alsosupport high-quality performance by auditors. The IFAC Code of Ethics for
Professional Accountants is frequently updated to ensure that all professionalaccountants – whether in public practice, business or government – have clear,
relevant and high-quality ethical guidance. The Code specifically addresses those
areas where the public interest is most significant, for example, matters relating toauditor independence. The International Accounting Education Standards Boardestablishes the standards necessary to ensure that professional accountants are
properly trained, both prior to their professional certification and throughout theircareers. Most recently, guidance on audit competence has been developed.
IFAC standard setters well recognize that use of our guidance is dependent on itsquality, which, in turn is dependent on our due process. John Kellas will bediscussing this in greater detail, but I think it is important to emphasize threecharacteristics of our standard-setting processes: 1) The processes are highlytransparent; 2) The individuals who have been selected to serve on ourstandard-setting boards have been selected because they are the best person forthe job, meaning they have the necessary skills and expertise; and 3) Projects areprioritized based on their contribution to the public interest.
Over the last year, all of IFAC’s independent standard-setting boards – the
IAASB, the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, theInternational Accounting Education Standards Board and the International PublicSector Accounting Standards Board –have enhanced the transparency of their
operations, increased input from stakeholders and the public, and strengthenedtheir consultative processes. All of these boards have public members serving onthem. They have consultative advisorygroups comprised of relevant stakeholders
who can provide meaningful input on the work programs of each group from apublic interest perspective. And each makes publicly available on the IFACwebsite agenda items and background materials for its meetings, as well as
exposure drafts of proposed standards. These initiatives make thesestandard-setting groups among the most transparent in the world, and their dueprocess, with significant public input, demonstrates that these boards are looking
outward to the needs of investors and others who rely on the work of accountantsand auditors.
I believe that the CICPA and its standard setters, like all standard settersworldwide, should continue to look outward, as it is doing, to consider the needsand expectations of both domestic and foreign investors. As you respond to thoseneeds, you will continue to build confidence in your accountancy profession and inyour markets.
Public interest oversight is another means of enhancing credibility. As IFACPresident Graham Ward pointed out, in February 2005, an independentinternational Public Interest Oversight Board, comprised of members nominatedby international organizations and regulators, was formally established to providepublic interest oversight of the IAASB, Ethics and Education Standards Boards
and the IFAC Member Body Compliance Program. This oversight will give thepublic greater confidence both in the standard-setting process and in the work
output itself – the standards.
Before I close, I would like to comment on the work of IFAC’s International Public
Sector Accounting Standards Board, which develops International Public SectorAccounting Standards (IPSASs) and whose work is closely related to that of theInternational Accounting Standards Board. These IPSASs are designed to
improve public sector financial management and accountability. This is anincreasingly important area of IFAC activity. Public sector financial reporting is anactivity which can contribute much to global economic management, whenupwards of 30 percent of resources in most economies are consumed by the
public sector. Ultimately, the consequences of poor financial reporting and poorfinancial management within governments are arguably even more serious than aloss of confidence in securities markets.
An important IPSASB objective is facilitating convergence with InternationalFinancial Reporting Standards, upon which the IPSASs are based. Our aim is thatgovernmental reporting and private sector reporting should be as comparable aspossible. We look forward to continuing to work with the Ministry of Finance andthe CICPA in this area, and we value very much your interest and yourcontribution in this area.
In closing, I would like to emphasize that China’s commitment to high-quality,
internationally respected, accounting and auditing standards that are consistentwith those developed by the IAASB and IASB, provides inspiration to thosecountries who also aspire to strengthen their financial systems and build investorconfidence.
There are numerous benefits to the actions you are taking today – · Investors will
have better information for decision making. · Companies too, will have improvedmanagement information for decision making. · In addition, Chinese companiesare likely to have better access to capital, particularly from foreign sources; thecost of capital may be reduced as well. · Your country will have increased accessto international capital markets. · There will also be greater credibility andimproved economic prospects for the accountancy profession. · Lastly, your
country can further enhance its competitiveness, which, in turn, can lead to
greater prosperity for all citizens.
I would like to conclude by saying that, with your release today on the newstandards of accounting and auditing, you are positioning China to have an evenbetter future.
I congratulate the Ministry of Finance and the CICPA for their leadership, for theirforesight, and for the very great achievements that today’s ceremony celebrates.
Thank you.
Speech made by Mr. Wang Jun
Assistant Minister of Ministry of Finance of P.R.C
at the ICAEW’ 125th Anniversary Conference at London, U.K.
Distinguished Mr. President
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am delighted to attend the ICAEW’ 125th anniversary conference and to have this
opportunity to discuss the development of the accountancy profession with all of
you here today. I would like to brief you on the development and roles of
accounting and auditing standards in China and to share with you our viewpoints
on the international convergence of accounting and auditing standards.
1. Rapid development of the Chinese economy has driven reform and
progress in the accountancy profession
Since the implementation of its reform and open-door policy in 1978, China has
made enormous achievements in its economic development. Between the 26
years from 1978 to 2004, the Chinese GDP grew from USD147.3billion to
USD1.6trillion, taking 6th place in the world with an annual growth rate of 9.4%;
aggregate import and export grew from USD20.6 to USD1.1trillion, taking 3rd place
in the world with an annual growth rate of over 16%; and foreign exchange
reserves grew from USD167million to USD609.9billion, ranking 2nd place in the
world. At the same time, the Chinese economy has become increasingly
integrated into the world economy. By the end of 2004, China had utilized in real
terms, a cumulative amount of USD562.1billion foreign direct investment (FDI) and
approved over 510,000 foreign-invested companies, while more than 7,700
Chinese companies had invested overseas with non-financial outbound investment
totaling USD37billion. China has also achieved positive results by participating in
the formulation of, and strictly complying with international trade rules.
While giving rise to enormous demand for development in the accountancy
profession, rapid economic development in China has also effectively brought
along and promoted continuous reforms and progress to the profession.
With regard to the development of accountancy standards, building on the
successful transformation of accounting from a planned economic pattern to one
of a market economy, with particular attention being placed upon continuous
harmonization by actively drawing upon the achievements of international
accounting standards,we have promulgated and enforced 16 specific accounting
standards and 3 sets of accounting treatment and reporting regulations (one for
the SME, one for enterprises in the financial sector and one for various other
areas) . As such, a preliminary mode ofaccountancy and a system of accounting
standards has taken shape, oriented to a market economy and specifically geared
to China’s economic development.
With regard to the development of auditing standards, since the publication of the
first batch of independent auditing standards, we have developed and published a
further 48 of these, covering technical standards, professional ethics, quality
control and CPE. So far, a primary system has been established with emphasis
placed upon harmonization with international standards in terms of basic principles
and essential procedures.
With respect to the development of accountancy and the CPA profession, China
has intensified its efforts in training accountants and auditors, responding to the
demands of economic development, particularly in the specialized human resource
field; and examination and a continued professional education system have been
established. At the moment, 363 higher education establishments nationwide offer
an accounting major, of which 22 provide a CPA major. In addition, 3 National
Accounting Institutes (NAIs) have been specially set up for training senior
accounting and auditing multi-disciplined talents that enjoy a comprehensive grasp
of relevant knowledge and expertise. By the end of 2004, 9.56 million accountants
had acquired practicing licenses, over 140,000 people had obtained the CPA
qualification; and 5,249 accounting firms had been established.
With regard to the opening up of the accounting market, there are 27 member
firms, 7 liaison firms and 20 representative offices for international accounting firms
in China. Hundreds of overseas candidates have passed the Chinese CPA
examinations, with 32 of these having succeeded in applying for the Chinese CPA
practicing license.
Reforms and progress in the Chinese accounting profession play an important role
in facilitating and ensuring the development of a market economy and maintenance
of good market order in China, in increasing confidence of domestic and overseas
investors in the Chinese market, in providing a transparent, fair, facilitating and
efficient investment environment, and in promoting a continued opening up of
China.
2. International convergence of accounting and auditing standards is
necessitated by economic globalization.
Taking a broad view of the current world, we find that the pattern of economic
operation featuring global allocation of resources and expansion of the market has
become an important trait and trend in the world economy. Tariff and non-tariff
barriers that affect trade have been significantly reduced, which has given rise to
an increasingly high degree of trade liberalization; development of the international
capital market, cross-border M & A and strategic alliance have enabled more
convenient and efficient global flow of production means such as capital and labor,
which has driven forward international convergence of various criteria and systems
in the economic field; and information resources, shared in more regions by more
extensive groups, have increasingly become an international public product. All
these have necessitated new requirements for and inserted new vitality into the
internationalization of professional services that feature knowledge and information
orientation.
Accounting is an important professional services area. As the “infrastructures” of
the market economy system, a public information resource and internationally
applied business language, the accounting service plays an important role in the
integrated development of national economies and indeed the global economy. In
fact, decision-making on worldwide allocation of resources is largely based on
financial statements. In today’s world, convergence of international financial
reporting standards and auditing standards has become an inevitable
trend. Genuine convergence will make it easier for investors to compare different
investment opportunities, however far away such opportunities are from each other
geographically. Investors will promote convergence of accounting systems and
pursue higher transparency. In other words, capital always flows to where it is
welcomed and stays where it is better treated.
We have recognized the important transformation of international accounting and
auditing standards from harmonization to convergence. Here, I would like to
illustrate my basic understanding of such international convergence.
First of all, convergence represents progress, and is the right
direction. Convergence furthers harmonization and embodies the requirements
of integrating international economies. Any organization that hopes to remain in the
international market cannot afford to disregard the trend of international
convergence. However, convergence requires concerted and maximum effort to
be realized.
Secondly, convergence does not equal ‘identical-ness’. Countries differ in
economic environments, legal systems, cultural philosophies, regulatory
structures, users of accounting information and quality of accountants. Without
paying due attention to national situations, accounting/audit development status or
environmental features, we will be unable to achieve true convergence.
Thirdly, convergence requires a process. Due to different national
characteristics, countries in the world need to continuously and actively carry out
voluntary cooperation, study new situations, address new issues and innovate new
mechanisms to create a structure which meets such requirements as international
efficiency, equitability, sovereignty, and development of global diversity.
Fourthly, convergence means interaction.Convergence does not mean
one-way movement. It means interaction between different countries, between
individual countries and IASB, and between IASB and regional professional
accounting bodies. They need to communicate with each other, to draw upon from
each other, and to obtain mutual recognition from each other. International
convergence in the context of a world of diversities is an objective law. By
complying with it, we can make better progress. Otherwise, effectiveness and
efficiency may be compromised.
3. Chinese measures for promoting international convergence of accounting
and auditing standards
Based on the above philosophies and understandings, we will actively promote
development and international convergence of Chinese accounting and auditing
standards. Our basic principle is to improve the Chinese systems of accounting
and auditing standards and accelerate their convergence with international
standards in line with the development process of China’s market economy, and by
responding to the overall trend of economic globalization.
Specifically, we will do the following.
First, use our best efforts to realize convergence. Where the basic principles
and approaches of an international standard fit an actual Chinese situation, we will
draw upon this standard. Where the basic principle and approach of an
international standard fit a Chinese situation but some technical details of the
standard fail to fit the Chinese reality, we will draw upon it to the fullest extent
possible and add, explain or modify it in accordance with the Chinese reality.
Meanwhile, we will actively advocate that the concerned international organization
consider the Chinese situation when revising this standard. Where the subjects of
an international standard are non-existent or have just started to emerge in China,
we will produce a relevant exposure drafton the basis of the international standard
to reflect the completeness of our national system of standards and officially issue
and implement the standard when relevant conditions allow.
Secondly, allow differences. Where the basic principle and approach of an
international standard do not realistically fit a Chinese situation, we will produce our
own solutions based on the Chinese reality and at the same time refer the case to
the bodies for setting international standards for consideration, when the latter
related standards have been developed. Moreover, a standard should comply
with the requirements of Chinese law in terms of its format and layout. The wording
and writing style should reflect the Chinese cultural tradition and linguistic habits to
make the standards easily understandable to users and to facilitate its
implementation.
Thirdly, innovate with enthusiasm. We will try to make innovations to the
structure and content of accounting/auditing standards. We will take full
advantage of being a late starter, carry out in-depth analysis, and produce systems
of standards that are complete in content and reasonable in structure in
accordance with the internal logic of accounting and auditing engagements and
transactions. Additionally, we will actively innovate the content of the standards.
For engagements or transactions unique to China, we will generate our own
solutions according to the Chinese situation.
Our planned objectives are as follows:
.. Draw upon high-quality international accounting standards that are
extensively applied or accepted worldwide such as International Financial
Reporting Standards, accelerate the development of Chinese accounting
standards and revise/supplement existing general and specific accounting
standards. We hope that by the end of 2005 we will have established a system
of Chinese accounting standards that matches the development stages of the
Chinese socialist market economy, covers various economic transactions of all
types of enterprises and is capable of independent implementation.
.. In accordance with requirements of international convergence, we will revise
some existing audit standards, develop a batch of new standards, and issue
some exposure drafts. We will endeavor to establish a primary system of
independent auditing standards that is catered to the development of the
Chinese economic system and responds to demands of international
convergence by the end of this year.
Ladies and gentlemen,
In the 21st century, China will stride into the great wave of world economic
development with a broader horizon and a more open
posture. Internationalization of the Chinese accounting profession is the objective
& subjective goal as well as the practical & strategic response as the Chinese
economy integrates into the world economy. Reciprocal cooperation and
interrelation among different economies will surely create a more promising future
for global economic growth. We hope that countries all over the world will jointly
write a new chapter in the historical development of accountingand auditing with a
broad mind that advocates modesty and cooperation and the grand devotion to the
recreation of an accounting/auditing civilization. We are more than happy to join
with all countries in the world to further reinforce exchanges with professional
accounting organizations and accountancy bodies, carry out sincere cooperation
as always, accelerate international convergence of accounting and auditing
standards and make new contributions to economic globalization.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman!
Thank you for your attention!
评论